Log in to see restricted items.
Reporting guidelines: welke zijn er voor een studie en een systematische review?
In internationale reporting guidelines staat gepubliceerd aan welke criteria een studie of systematische review bij voorkeur voldoet om de transparantie van rapportering te bevorderen en reporting bias te vermijden. Op de webpagina’s over “Publiceren" op de website van het Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg Gent vind je hierover meer informatie.
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
artikel
FFW
FGE
systematische review
tijdschrift
Research Data Management: What is RDM?
Research Data Management (RDM) is a broad term that encompasses all practices and actions to ensure that research data are secure, sustainable, and easy to find, understand and (re)use, not only during a research project, but also in the longer term. Taking proper care of data is an essential …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
open science
research data management
Research Integrity: online training tool Mind the GAP
What and how
'Mind the GAP' is an English-language online training tool for all researchers and all those involved in research, from PhD students to more experienced researchers, to trainers/teachers and policy makers. The focus is on research integrity and the promotion of good research practices in all disciplines.
The …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research assessment: altmetrics and using Altmetric
What are altmetrics?
Altmetrics are measures that capture the attention a resource generates on the social web or other sources. They can be applied to journal articles, books/book chapters, software, datasets, websites, videos, etc.
Altmetrics attempt to show influence and engagement of work through blogs, reference management systems, scholarly social …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: guideline for responsible evaluation
Each research evaluation at Ghent University adheres to eight principles, which together ensure that research can be evaluated in a responsible and high-quality manner.
More on Responsible research assessment
1. The evaluation is necessaryV It is necessary, useful and meaningful for Ghent University to organize this evaluation at this …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: guidelines when using quantitative indicators (for evaluation organisers)
In general
There are many quantitative indicators, and new ones are still being developed. Examples of quantitative indicators include: the number of (scholarly) publications, number of citations, citation impact (normalized), number of downloaded (open access) papers, number of users of deposited datasets, number of mentions of a study/publication on social …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: tips for researchers who want to use quantitative indicators in their CV, project application, etc.
There are many quantitative indicators, and new ones are still being developed. Examples of quantitative indicators include: the number of (scholarly) publications, number of citations, citation impact (normalized), number of downloaded (open access) papers, number of users of deposited datasets, number of mentions of a study/publication on social media and/or …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: what are ARRA and CoARA?
The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) brings together research institutions, research funders, national accreditation agencies, scientific academies and their umbrella organizations, all aiming for a global reform of how research and researchers are evaluated. All CoARA members have signed the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA). Central to …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research assessment: what is DORA?
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) is a global initiative intended to guide the way in which research is assessed at the point of recruitment and promotion, and in the awarding of project funding. Since 2012, all actors involved in the evaluation of research – research performing and …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
evaluate
quality assessment
Research integrity training: 7 knowledge clips
The knowledge clips on training research integrity: a series of 7 clips
In total there are 7 knowledge clips available on training research integrity. They are all in English.
Knowledge clip 1 - presentation: the basics
Knowledge clip 2 - presentation: the trainer's perspective
Knowledge clip 3 - exercise: the …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 1: the basics
Knowledge clip 1: the basics
Knowledge clip 1 is a general and rather theoretical introduction about what research integrity is, and why it is important, incl. all the technical jargon. Using the ALLEA code, it is explained how researchers can behave in an integer way and what kind of behaviour …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 2: the trainer perspective
Knowledge clip 2: the trainer perspective
In order to make a successful training module, stand-alone or as part of another course, there are some terms and conditions you as a teacher/trainer need to consider, in terms of the design, the content of the training and the characteristics of the trainer. This …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 3: the good researcher
Knowledge clip 3: the good researcher
In the exercise ‘the good researcher’ the trainees identify the characteristics of a good researcher. They are stimulated to explore the different meanings of ‘goodness’, and to reflect on similarities and differences between researchers and research disciplines. As a trainer, you can link the …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 4: the lab
Knowledge clip 4: the lab
This clip contains the exercise “The lab – who and what“. The movie and roleplay “The lab” was produced by the American Office of Research Integrity, ORI.
In the exercise ‘the lab’ the trainees identify what is at stake (or at risk) in the event …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 5: the dilemma game
Knowledge clip 5: the dilemma game
The Dilemma Game has been developed by Erasmus University Rotterdam to stimulate awareness of research integrity.
The game wants to make trainees reflect on a particular case, a so-called dilemma. They should consider how to act in an integer way whenever they are confronted …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 6: the middle position
Knowledge clip 6: the middle position
One of the most interesting and meaningful things to do in a research integrity training is to analyse a real-life case. That is: the description of a situation in which researchers are being challenged to act according to the values and norms of research …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity training: knowledge clip 7: closure
Knowledge clip 7: closure
This clip gives some inspiration on how to close or wrap up a workshop or class on research integrity.
It is advisable to watch clip 1 (basics) and clip 2 (trainer perspective) first.
This clip dates from February 2022 - last check February 2024.
…
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
lecture
lezing
quality assessment
Research integrity: ALLEA code – European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The ALLEA code
The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, is better known in the research community as the “ALLEA code”, simply because it …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: Commission for Research Integrity
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
There’s no clear-cut definition of research integrity, nor do we have a list of 'does and don’ts' that apply for all researchers, in all …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: a suspicion of violation– what to do?
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
We can situate research practices on a continuum from good to bad. Bad research practices include misconduct or fraud, on the one hand, and …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: reasons to care
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Why you should care about research integrity
Research integrity is part of quality assurance in research. Doing the right thing always improves quality and it …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: the 'slippery slope' from good to bad
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The continuum from good to bad
Research integrity is part of researchers’ professional responsibility and inherently connected to what researchers do (or not) in a …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research integrity: trending topic – paper mills
This section draws on:
the relevant web pages of COPE concerning the paper mill phenomenon. https://publicationethics.org/publishers-perspective-paper-mills + related resources as mentioned on this page.
https://www.enago.com/academy/paper-mills-a-rising-concern-in-the-academic-community/
Current topics are often new and knowledge is subject to further development or deepening. This tip was prepared on the basis of the relevant …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
academisch schrijven
article
artikel
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
journal
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
tijdschrift
Research integrity: what is it about?
You can use slides and information from this research tip, taking into account the conditions as set out in following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
(Research) Integrity
Integrity is about
- doing the right things
- doing things right
- all of this at the right time
- regardless of whether no …
level: algemeen
tags:
ethics
ethiek
integriteit
integrity
kwaliteitsbeoordeling
quality assessment
Research visibility: approach to increase your visibility
Having good visibility of scientific output, ensures greater reach and may lead to greater impact of your scientific work, on a scientific, social and economic level.
The roadmap below can be used as a guide to promote the visibility of your scientific research.
Resources: helpful tools to find literature
These tools will help you find literature on the topic of your choice.
-
lib.ugent.be
You can find over 4.000.000 references for books, serials, images, theses, and databases in the library catalogue of Ghent University. Many of these can be consulted online, from the comfort of your home.
If you can't …
level: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
evaluate
library
search strategy
Resources: search and find information
Do you need to write a text or do you need to find information and you are looking for the right resources? Follow the step-by-step plan below.
Step 1: define your subject- Narrow down your subject based on the literature you find.
- Explore the subject. You can read a paper …
level: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
library
search strategy
Retraction Watch: what is it?
Retraction Watch, acquired by Crossref in September 2023, is a database that lists retracted (retractions) or corrected (corrections) publications, or publications with an expressions of concern. A blog is connected to the database, highlighting some of the retracted publications. Though Retraction Watch only started in 2010, older publications can …
Read morelevel: algemeen
tags:
academic writing
article
copyright
evaluate
integrity
quality assessment
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online
De Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online is een digitale encyclopedie, met meer dan 2800 lemma's over filosofie uit alle werelddelen en periodes uit de geschiedenis. Je kan er zoeken op o.a. onderwerp, periode, regio, religie, etc. Bij elk onderwerp krijg je duiding, en ook een lijst van wetenschappelijke literatuur over het …
Read moreAgenda
-
Nov 29
Knowledge 2 Connect: UpToDate for clinical practice and UpToDate for clinical research
-
Feb 07
Knowledge 2 Connect: Unlocking the Secrets to Publication with Editor’s insights
-
Mar 14
Knowledge 2 Connect: Stress Management for Researchers: Strategies, Support and Building Resilience